You are here
Home > java > Core Java >

Java Records vs JPA Entities and Lombok

Java Records vs JPA Entities and LombokJava Records vs JPA Entities and Lombok: A Comprehensive Comparison

JPA entities are the basic concepts for those who have developed a Java project using JPA or any JPA based framework such as Hibernate. While developing such project, we create an entity class as the first step. After the introduction of Record classes, it becomes a part of discussion whether we can use Records in place of Entities or not.

Java Records provide a concise way to define immutable data objects. On the other hand, JPA Entities are the backbone of persistence in Java applications, that allow objects to be stored and retrieved from databases.

This article explores the similarities, differences, and use cases for Java Records and JPA Entities, with examples, pros, and cons.

What are Java Records?

Java Records are immutable, data-centric classes that reduce boilerplate code by automatically generating:

  • A canonical constructor.
  • getters for all fields.
  • equals(), hashCode(), and toString() methods.

Syntax of a Record

public record Employee(String name, String department, double salary) {}

What are JPA Entities?

JPA Entities are Java objects mapped to database tables. They are defined using annotations and can be persisted, retrieved, and updated using JPA and its implementations, such as Hibernate.

Syntax of a JPA Entity

@Entity
public class Employee {
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    private Long id;
    private String name;
    private String department;
    private double salary;

    // Getters, Setters, Constructors, equals(), hashCode(), toString()
}

Java Records vs. JPA Entities

Feature Java Records JPA Entities
Immutability Immutable by design; fields cannot be changed after creation. Mutable by default; fields can be updated.
Boilerplate Code Minimal (auto-generated getters, constructors, etc.). Requires manual definition of constructors, getters, setters.
Persistence Support Limited; requires workarounds for JPA. Fully supported by JPA and Hibernate.
Lifecycle Methods No lifecycle callbacks (e.g., @PrePersist, @PostLoad). Supports lifecycle annotations for better control.
Performance Immutable nature may cause performance overhead in updates. Directly mutable, leading to efficient updates.
Lazy Loading Not supported effectively. Fully supported by JPA.
Suitability Best for read-only or DTOs. Best for entities requiring frequent updates or relationships.

Using Java Records as JPA Entities

Java Records can be used as JPA entities, but they come with limitations due to their immutable nature and lack of no-args constructors.

ORM framework such as Hibernate 6.2 and later version provides out-of-the-box support for Java Records, which makes it easier to use them as entities. Ensure you are using Hibernate 6.2+ or other JPA providers that support Records by setting up the required dependency in your project.

Let’s check it with an example:

Example: Java Record as a JPA Entity

import jakarta.persistence.Entity;
import jakarta.persistence.GeneratedValue;
import jakarta.persistence.GenerationType;
import jakarta.persistence.Id;

@Entity
public record Employee(
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    Long id,
    String name,
    String department,
    double salary
) {}

How It Works?

  • Creating Table: Creates a database table with record name ’employee’.
  • Creating Columns and mapping Fields: Creates columns & Record fields are mapped to database columns.
  • Persistence: Hibernate can instantiate records via the canonical constructor.

Limitations of Using Records in place of Entities

  1. No-Args Constructor Requirement:
    • JPA requires a no-args constructor for entity instantiation via reflection. Records don’t provide this by design.
    • Workaround: Hibernate supports canonical constructors.
  2. Immutable Nature:
    • JPA entities need to be mutable for features like dirty checking and updates.
  3. Lifecycle Callbacks:
    • Records do not support annotations for lifecycle callback methods such as @PrePersist, @PostPersist, @PreUpdate, @PostUpdate, @PreRemove, @PostRemove, @PostLoad.
  4. Lazy Loading Issues:
    • Lazy-loaded fields can’t be initialized in immutable records, making them unsuitable for complex relationships.

Using Records as DTOs

Records are excellent for Data Transfer Objects (DTOs), where immutability and conciseness are advantageous.

Example: Record as a DTO

public record EmployeeDTO(String name, String department, double salary) {}
  • Used to fetch data from the database and transfer it to the client.
  • Avoids exposing the mutable state of JPA entities.

Using JPA Entities for Full Persistence

JPA Entities are designed to handle:

  1. CRUD Operations: Easy creation, updates, and deletions.
  2. Complex Relationships: Supports @OneToMany, @ManyToOne, etc.
  3. Lifecycle Callbacks: Provides hooks for callback methods @PrePersist, @PostPersist, @PreUpdate, @PostUpdate, @PreRemove, @PostRemove, @PostLoad etc.

Example: Traditional JPA Entity

@Entity
public class Employee {
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    private Long id;
    private String name;
    private String department;
    private double salary;

    // Constructors, Getters, Setters
}

Pros and Cons of Java Records

Pros

  1. Reduced Boilerplate: Automatic generation of constructors and methods.
  2. Immutability: Safer design for multi-threaded applications.
  3. Readability: Concise and easy-to-understand syntax.
  4. Ideal for DTOs: Best for read-only data transfer.

Cons

  1. Limited JPA Support: Not suitable for entities requiring updates or relationships.
  2. No Lifecycle Methods: Cannot use @PrePersist, @PostLoad, etc.
  3. Lazy Loading Issues: Incompatible with Hibernate’s lazy-loading proxies.

Pros and Cons of JPA Entities

Pros

  1. Rich Persistence Features: Full support for CRUD operations and relationships.
  2. Lifecycle Hooks: Fine-grained control over the entity lifecycle.
  3. Lazy Loading: Efficient loading of related data.

Cons

  1. Boilerplate Code: Requires manual implementation of constructors, getters, and setters.
  2. Mutable State: Requires careful handling in multi-threaded environments.
  3. Verbose Annotations: Can become complex with advanced mappings.

Comparison with Lombok: Enhancing JPA Entities

Lombok is a popular Java library that minimizes boilerplate code by auto-generating methods like getters, setters, equals(), hashCode(), and toString() using simple annotations. Although Lombok is not a core feature of Java like Records, but it can streamline the development of JPA Entities by making it an effective middle ground between Records and traditional JPA Entities.

JPA Entity with Lombok

Below is an example of a JPA Entity using Lombok annotations.

import jakarta.persistence.*;
import lombok.*;

@Entity
@Getter
@Setter
@NoArgsConstructor
@AllArgsConstructor
@ToString
@EqualsAndHashCode
public class Employee {
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    private Long id;
    private String name;
    private String department;
    private double salary;
}

Lombok Features

  1. @Getter and @Setter:
    • Auto-generates getter and setter methods for all fields.
  2. @NoArgsConstructor and @AllArgsConstructor:
    • Automatically generates constructors.
    • JPA requires a no-args constructor for entity instantiation.
  3. @ToString and @EqualsAndHashCode:
    • Simplifies implementation of these methods for debugging and equality checks.
  4. Immutability (Optional):
    • Use @Value to make fields final and the class immutable, similar to Java Records, though this requires manual adjustments for JPA compatibility.

Comparison: Java Records vs. JPA Entities with Lombok

Feature Java Records JPA Entities (Traditional) JPA Entities with Lombok
Boilerplate Code Minimal, auto-generated constructors and methods. Requires manual getters, setters, constructors, etc. Simplified via Lombok annotations.
Immutability Immutable by default. Mutable by default. Supports immutability with @Value (additional effort).
JPA Compatibility Limited; no-args constructor required. Fully compatible. Fully compatible (with no-args constructor).
Lifecycle Methods Support Not supported. Fully supported. Fully supported.
Lazy Loading Not effectively supported. Fully supported. Fully supported.
Readability Concise syntax. Verbose. Balanced with annotations reducing boilerplate.
Performance Immutable design may add overhead. Efficient for updates due to mutability. Same as traditional entities.

Example: Lombok vs. Record

Record Example

@Entity
public record Employee(
    @Id 
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    Long id,
    String name,
    String department,
    double salary
) {}

Lombok Example

@Entity
@Getter
@Setter
@NoArgsConstructor
@AllArgsConstructor
@ToString
public class Employee {
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    private Long id;
    private String name;
    private String department;
    private double salary;
}

Key Differences:

  • Record: Immutable by default, concise, but lacks full JPA compatibility.
  • Lombok: Mutable, boilerplate-free, and fully compatible with JPA.

Pros and Cons of Using Lombok

Pros:

  1. Reduces Boilerplate: Significantly reduces verbosity without sacrificing JPA compatibility.
  2. Flexibility: Supports both mutable and immutable designs (@Value for immutability).
  3. JPA-Friendly: Automatically generates the no-args constructor required by JPA.
  4. Easy Debugging: @ToString and @EqualsAndHashCode make debugging and testing easier.

Cons:

  1. Learning Curve: Requires understanding Lombok annotations and their impact.
  2. Build Dependency: Introduces a dependency on Lombok, which may not be acceptable for some projects.
  3. Compile-Time Magic: Generated code isn’t visible in the source, which might confuse new developers.
  4. Immutable Design Requires Extra Work: Unlike Records, immutability with Lombok is not the default and requires explicit annotations.

How to Use Lombok with Java Records?

Java Records are a concise and immutable way to define data carriers, but there may still be scenarios where we want to leverage additional features provided by Lombok. Lombok can enhance Java Records by adding annotations for functionality like logging, equals/hashCode customization, or even getter/setter customization.

We can further reduce code by using Lombok with Java Records when additional functionality is needed.

Using Lombok Annotations with Java Records

Lombok can be used with Records to extend their functionality. Below are some examples of how Lombok works with Java Records.

Example#1: Adding Logging

Java Records do not have built-in support for logging, but Lombok’s annotation can add it. For example, below code snipper uses @Slf4j.

import lombok.extern.slf4j.Slf4j;

@Slf4j
public record Employee(Long id, String name, double salary) {
    public Employee {
        log.info("Employee record created: {}, {}", name, salary);
    }
}

Explanation:

  • The @Slf4j annotation enables logging.
  • Logs a message whenever an instance of the record is created.

Example#2: Adding @ToString

Although Java Records already generate a toString method, Lombok’s @ToString can add additional formatting or exclude certain fields.

import lombok.ToString;
@ToString(onlyExplicitlyIncluded = true)
public record Project(Long id, @ToString.Include String name, double budget) {
}

Explanation:

  • If onlyExplicitlyIncluded is true, only fields marked with @ToString.Include will be included. Similarly, fields marked with @ToString.Exclude excludes specific fields from the output.
  • If onlyExplicitlyIncluded is false, it will have the reverse behavior.
  • Customizes which fields are included in the toString representation.

Example#3: Customizing equals and hashCode

While Records auto-generate equals and hashCode, Lombok allows customization through annotations like @EqualsAndHashCode.

import lombok.EqualsAndHashCode;

@EqualsAndHashCode(onlyExplicitlyIncluded = true)
public record Department(Long id, @EqualsAndHashCode.Include String name) {
}

Explanation:

  • Controls which fields participate in equality checks.
  • If onlyExplicitlyIncluded is true, only fields marked with @EqualsAndHashCode.Include are considered. Similarly, @EqualsAndHashCode.Exclude excludes fields from equality checks.
  • This can override the default behavior of including all fields.

Java Records vs JPA Entities and Lombok: A Comparison

Aspect Lombok with JPA Entities Lombok with Java Records
Immutability Mutable by default but can be made immutable with @Value. Records are immutable by default.
Boilerplate Reduction Eliminates boilerplate for getters, setters, and constructors. Minimal boilerplate to begin with; Lombok adds specific enhancements.
Custom Annotations Fully supported for additional functionality (e.g., @Slf4j, @EqualsAndHashCode). Also supported but focuses on extending existing Record capabilities.
JPA Compatibility Fully compatible with JPA annotations and lifecycle methods. Limited compatibility with JPA due to immutability constraints.
Derived Fields Supported via Lombok annotations like @Getter. Derived fields can be added with @Getter but break immutability.
Logging Support Fully supported via Lombok’s logging annotations. Fully supported.

Important Points to Consider

  1. Boilerplate Reduction:
    • Lombok significantly reduces boilerplate in JPA Entities.
    • For Records, Lombok is only needed for specific use cases.
  2. Immutability:
    • Java Records are inherently immutable, but Lombok can add flexibility to JPA Entities.
  3. Use with JPA:
    • Records struggle with JPA due to immutability and the need for no-arg constructors.
    • Lombok works seamlessly with JPA, generating constructors and mutable fields.

Using Lombok with Java Records can add value in specific scenarios, such as logging, customizing methods, or adding/removing fields. However, it is essential to understand the limitations and compatibility issues when combining these two tools. Although Records already simplify code, Lombok enhances their functionality further, making it easier to write clean, maintainable code.

FAQs

When to Use Java Records?

  • For read-only use cases or DTOs where immutability and simplicity are preferred.
  • When there is no need for lazy loading or lifecycle methods.

When to Use JPA Entities?

  • For full-fledged persistence use cases where CRUD operations, complex relationships, and lazy loading are needed.
  • When the entity state needs to be mutable.

When to Use Lombok?

Lombok strikes a balance between the simplicity of Java Records and the full functionality of JPA Entities. It is ideal for:

  • Reducing boilerplate in traditional JPA Entities.
  • Projects requiring full JPA compatibility with minimal verbosity.
  • Teams familiar with Lombok or willing to accept its dependency.

By combining Lombok with JPA, developers can achieve clean, maintainable code while retaining all features of a traditional JPA Entity.

When to Use Lombok with Records?

  1. Adding Custom Features: Use Lombok for logging, customized equals/hashCode, or fields.
  2. Reducing Boilerplate Further: For projects that require more complex Record behavior.
  3. Combining Simplicity and Power: When the default features of Records are insufficient.

Conclusion

Java Records and JPA Entities each serve distinct purposes:

  • Use records for immutability and concise representations of data.
  • Use entities for robust persistence and database operations.

We can choose the best approach for our application’s needs by understanding their strengths and limitations. Using Java Records as JPA entities is a viable approach for simple and immutable data models. However, they are best suited for specific scenarios where immutability and reduced boilerplate are critical. For more complex use cases, traditional JPA entities with standard classes might still be a better choice.

Using Lombok with Java Records offers a way to bridge the gap between concise syntax and enhanced functionality. While Records are inherently boilerplate-free, Lombok can complement them for specialized needs, such as logging, customized methods, and derived fields. However, for JPA use cases, Lombok is a more natural fit due to the inherent mutability and flexibility required for JPA Entities.


You may also go through a detailed article on Lombok: How To configure Lombok in your Spring Boot Project?, Lombok Annotations etc.


 

One thought on “Java Records vs JPA Entities and Lombok

Leave a Reply


Top